Area info, specific search results, and unique insights.
The bottom dots represent local averages. Period is 5 years.
September 2022 (Recent) | £310,000 |
March 2022 (Recent) | £160,000 |
April 2020 | £234,000 |
December 2020 (2 total sales) | £255,000 |
April 2019 | £260,000 |
September 2018 | £161,500 |
March 2018 | £162,000 |
January 2017 | £215,000 |
June 2021 (3 total sales) | £291,000 |
May 2017 (3 total sales) | £279,000 |
August 2012 | £189,000 |
October 2018 (2 total sales) | £210,000 |
January 2022 (Recent) (3 total sales) | £210,000 |
August 2021 (3 total sales) | £160,000 |
January 2021 (4 total sales) | £239,000 |
June 2007 | £140,000 |
May 2007 | £127,500 |
April 2023 (Recent) (2 total sales) | £270,000 |
November 2018 (3 total sales) | £202,000 |
May 2015 (3 total sales) | £253,000 |
June 2019 (5 total sales) | £250,000 |
May 2006 | £98,000 |
May 2006 | £162,500 |
January 2013 (4 total sales) | £185,000 |
August 2015 (2 total sales) | £240,000 |
December 2016 (3 total sales) | £276,000 |
October 2004 | £152,000 |
December 2004 (4 total sales) | £175,000 |
September 2000 | £84,500 |
July 2001 (2 total sales) | £70,000 |
August 2010 (4 total sales) | £147,500 |
February 2006 (2 total sales) | £142,000 |
June 2016 (4 total sales) | £235,200 |
June 1999 | £58,000 |
October 2017 (3 total sales) | £258,000 |
September 2002 (3 total sales) | £141,950 |
May 1998 | £185,000 |
November 2009 (2 total sales) | £110,000 |
February 1998 | £63,000 |
February 2015 (3 total sales) | £247,500 |
February 2017 (3 total sales) | £240,000 |
July 2000 (2 total sales) | £75,000 |
August 2020 (3 total sales) | £285,000 |
January 2017 (2 total sales) | £267,500 |
October 2019 (5 total sales) | £257,000 |
January 2000 (2 total sales) | £74,500 |
The type distribution in WD23 1FT is as follows:
Detached: 1
Terraced: 1
Semi-Detached: None
Flats: 52
The most expensive sale recorded is 98 Claybury, Bushey which sold for £310,000 on Sep 28, 2022. The property is in tax band C. The property has a price per square metre of £5,254 psqm, which is -2% lower than the area average.