Area info, specific search results, and unique insights.
The bottom dots represent local averages. Period is 5 years.
December 2021 | £561,000 |
October 2020 | £505,000 |
December 2022 (Recent) (2 total sales) | £565,000 |
May 2019 | £525,000 |
March 2021 (2 total sales) | £790,000 |
January 2018 | £393,000 |
July 2017 | £356,500 |
March 2016 | £330,000 |
January 2019 (2 total sales) | £325,000 |
June 2018 (3 total sales) | £380,000 |
May 2015 | £275,000 |
March 2015 | £365,000 |
March 2023 (Recent) (2 total sales) | £470,000 |
October 2020 (2 total sales) | £425,000 |
November 2013 | £340,000 |
December 2020 (2 total sales) | £385,000 |
May 2013 | £249,950 |
October 2016 (2 total sales) | £350,000 |
May 2011 | £230,000 |
October 2020 (2 total sales) | £396,000 |
August 2011 (3 total sales) | £250,000 |
October 2012 (2 total sales) | £380,000 |
April 2009 | £190,000 |
July 2016 (2 total sales) | £379,950 |
May 2008 | £225,000 |
June 2012 (3 total sales) | £330,000 |
April 2015 (2 total sales) | £340,000 |
December 2020 (2 total sales) | £362,500 |
March 2007 | £277,500 |
October 2017 (2 total sales) | £405,000 |
September 2020 (2 total sales) | £390,000 |
September 2006 | £240,000 |
November 2013 (2 total sales) | £345,000 |
February 2022 (Recent) (2 total sales) | £423,000 |
June 2021 (2 total sales) | £425,000 |
July 2023 (Recent) (2 total sales) | £412,250 |
August 2005 (3 total sales) | £222,000 |
September 2021 (3 total sales) | £419,000 |
June 2022 (Recent) (3 total sales) | £825,000 |
March 2000 | £235,000 |
June 2015 (2 total sales) | £370,000 |
November 2020 (3 total sales) | £400,000 |
October 2023 (Recent) (3 total sales) | £450,000 |
September 1997 | £100,000 |
February 2014 (2 total sales) | £260,000 |
November 2020 (2 total sales) | £365,000 |
The type distribution in Royal Drive is as follows:
Detached: 8
Terraced: 10
Semi-Detached: 44
Flats: None
The most expensive sale recorded is 44a Royal Drive, Epsom which sold for £561,000 on Dec 3, 2021. The property has a price per square metre of £4,795 psqm, which is -8% lower than the area average.