Area info, specific search results, and unique insights.
The bottom dots represent local averages. Period is 5 years.
April 2023 (Recent) | £242,000 |
September 2022 (Recent) | £251,000 |
May 2021 (2 total sales) | £227,000 |
February 2021 (2 total sales) | £425,000 |
January 2021 | £220,000 |
May 2020 (2 total sales) | £258,000 |
March 2020 (2 total sales) | £260,000 |
October 2019 (2 total sales) | £227,500 |
September 2019 (3 total sales) | £220,000 |
May 2019 (2 total sales) | £250,000 |
April 2019 (2 total sales) | £225,000 |
March 2019 | £216,000 |
October 2018 (2 total sales) | £190,000 |
September 2018 (3 total sales) | £228,500 |
April 2018 (2 total sales) | £235,000 |
November 2017 | £232,000 |
September 2016 (3 total sales) | £176,000 |
March 2016 (4 total sales) | £192,000 |
October 2015 (2 total sales) | £169,000 |
May 2014 | £142,000 |
January 2014 | £147,000 |
October 2013 | £150,000 |
August 2021 (3 total sales) | £280,000 |
August 2013 | £144,500 |
February 2013 (2 total sales) | £138,000 |
April 2011 (2 total sales) | £149,000 |
September 2010 | £143,000 |
May 2010 | £135,000 |
April 2010 | £125,000 |
September 2021 (3 total sales) | £245,000 |
November 2008 | £160,000 |
January 2007 (3 total sales) | £164,950 |
October 2006 (2 total sales) | £151,950 |
August 2006 (2 total sales) | £161,000 |
March 2006 (2 total sales) | £152,000 |
August 2005 | £142,000 |
July 2005 (3 total sales) | £154,000 |
May 2011 (3 total sales) | £170,000 |
January 2004 | £141,000 |
July 2002 | £140,000 |
September 2001 | £110,000 |
August 2001 | £83,000 |
July 2001 | £89,000 |
April 2001 | £83,500 |
February 2001 | £81,920 |
February 1999 (2 total sales) | £60,000 |
March 1998 | £64,950 |
September 2013 (3 total sales) | £175,000 |
The type distribution in Aylesbury Close is as follows:
Detached: 3
Terraced: 29
Semi-Detached: 41
Flats: None
The most expensive sale recorded is 1 Aylesbury Close, Norwich which sold for £425,000 on Feb 1, 2021. The property is in tax band D. The property has a price per square metre of £2,471 psqm, which is -12% lower than the area average.