Area info, specific search results, and unique insights.
The bottom dots represent local averages. Period is 5 years.
August 2023 (Recent) | £255,000 |
March 2022 (Recent) | £280,000 |
April 2021 | £215,000 |
December 2020 | £240,000 |
October 2020 | £295,000 |
July 2019 | £237,000 |
June 2019 | £245,000 |
April 2018 | £260,000 |
March 2018 | £224,000 |
April 2017 | £248,000 |
July 2015 | £225,000 |
June 2015 | £227,000 |
May 2015 | £240,000 |
May 2015 | £207,000 |
March 2015 | £235,000 |
August 2014 | £268,000 |
June 2016 (2 total sales) | £246,500 |
January 2014 | £235,000 |
August 2021 (3 total sales) | £272,000 |
March 2011 | £171,000 |
February 2011 (2 total sales) | £225,000 |
May 2019 (2 total sales) | £252,500 |
June 2018 (2 total sales) | £272,000 |
February 2021 (2 total sales) | £235,000 |
December 2016 (4 total sales) | £250,000 |
December 2016 (2 total sales) | £257,000 |
August 2007 | £197,000 |
March 2007 | £205,000 |
August 2006 (3 total sales) | £183,000 |
September 2008 (2 total sales) | £195,000 |
October 2011 (2 total sales) | £220,000 |
August 2004 | £132,000 |
July 2018 (2 total sales) | £250,000 |
May 2009 (2 total sales) | £198,000 |
May 2003 | £169,000 |
May 2017 (2 total sales) | £250,000 |
March 2016 (2 total sales) | £249,000 |
September 2005 (2 total sales) | £202,000 |
February 2000 | £92,300 |
August 2022 (Recent) (2 total sales) | £330,000 |
February 1999 | £100,000 |
November 2004 (3 total sales) | £205,000 |
December 2007 (2 total sales) | £215,000 |
December 2012 (3 total sales) | £220,500 |
December 2019 (2 total sales) | £270,000 |
July 2015 (2 total sales) | £270,000 |
August 1996 | £52,000 |
March 2008 (2 total sales) | £225,000 |
October 1995 | £48,500 |
June 1995 | £52,000 |
The type distribution in Tenterden Drive is as follows:
Detached: None
Terraced: 55
Semi-Detached: 12
Flats: 6
The most expensive sale recorded is 97 Tenterden Drive, Canterbury which sold for £295,000 on Oct 16, 2020. The property is in tax band D. The property has a price per square metre of £2,458 psqm, which is -40% lower than the area average.