Area info, specific search results, and unique insights.
The bottom dots represent local averages. Period is 5 years.
March 2022 (Recent) | £70,000 |
January 2020 | £52,000 |
November 2019 | £66,000 |
November 2019 | £39,995 |
July 2023 (Recent) (2 total sales) | £76,000 |
July 2016 | £37,000 |
June 2016 | £40,000 |
July 2015 | £51,250 |
February 2016 (2 total sales) | £55,500 |
January 2023 (Recent) (4 total sales) | £86,000 |
April 2012 | £66,500 |
March 2014 (2 total sales) | £62,500 |
August 2022 (Recent) (2 total sales) | £39,995 |
February 2016 (3 total sales) | £61,000 |
May 2008 (2 total sales) | £87,750 |
August 2021 (3 total sales) | £80,000 |
June 2017 (4 total sales) | £49,000 |
January 2007 | £68,250 |
August 2021 (6 total sales) | £70,700 |
June 2006 (2 total sales) | £77,500 |
May 2005 | £65,000 |
April 2005 | £75,000 |
February 2005 | £65,000 |
August 2021 (4 total sales) | £80,000 |
December 2003 | £41,000 |
November 2020 (2 total sales) | £39,955 |
August 2003 | £39,000 |
July 2020 (2 total sales) | £49,000 |
August 2014 (2 total sales) | £50,000 |
December 2019 (2 total sales) | £45,000 |
November 2002 | £26,000 |
March 2003 (2 total sales) | £34,500 |
April 2003 (3 total sales) | £38,500 |
January 2005 (2 total sales) | £73,000 |
January 2001 | £12,000 |
November 2000 | £31,000 |
March 2020 (2 total sales) | £63,000 |
March 2006 (3 total sales) | £72,000 |
October 1999 | £15,000 |
March 1999 | £15,000 |
March 2010 (2 total sales) | £63,000 |
May 1998 | £26,500 |
June 2003 (2 total sales) | £47,500 |
July 2012 (3 total sales) | £57,000 |
June 1997 | £27,075 |
May 2005 (2 total sales) | £70,000 |
June 2017 (2 total sales) | £65,000 |
January 2017 (2 total sales) | £64,000 |
January 1996 | £28,000 |
The type distribution in Grasmere Road is as follows:
Detached: None
Terraced: 64
Semi-Detached: None
Flats: None
The most expensive sale recorded is 55 Grasmere Road, Darlington which sold for £90,000 on Apr 25, 2008. The property is in tax band A. The property has a price per square metre of £990 psqm, which is -52% lower than the area average.