Area info, specific search results, and unique insights.
The bottom dots represent local averages. Period is 5 years.
Save
Data validity fully verified
| October 2019 | £435,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| June 2017 | £630,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| March 2017 | £535,000 |
Data validity fully verified
| December 2014 | £475,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| April 2018 (2 total sales) | £430,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| May 2011 | £340,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| February 2011 | £332,500 |
Data validity fully verified
| December 2022 (Recent) (3 total sales) | £785,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| September 2006 | £350,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| July 2006 | £380,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| August 2005 | £295,000 |
Data validity fully verified
| May 2005 | £330,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| September 2007 (2 total sales) | £387,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| January 2002 | £245,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| May 2010 (3 total sales) | £399,950 |
Data validity partially verified
| August 2023 (Recent) (3 total sales) | £565,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| November 2014 (2 total sales) | £390,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| July 2019 (3 total sales) | £467,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| September 1997 | £142,500 |
Data validity partially verified
| February 1997 | £120,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| October 2000 (2 total sales) | £268,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| February 2000 (2 total sales) | £196,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| January 1998 (2 total sales) | £230,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| February 1995 | £135,250 |
The type distribution in Gloucester Drive is as follows:
Detached: 41
Terraced: None
Semi-Detached: 18
Flats: None
The most expensive sale recorded is 35 Gloucester Drive, Staines-upon-thames which sold for £630,000 on Jun 16, 2017. The property is in tax band G. The property has a price per square metre of £3,865 psqm, which is -12% lower than the area average.
