Area info, specific search results, and unique insights.
The bottom dots represent local averages. Period is 5 years.
Save
Data validity partially verified
| August 2022 (Recent) | £152,150 |
Data validity partially verified
| October 2020 (2 total sales) | £300,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| October 2020 (2 total sales) | £298,000 |
Data validity fully verified
| April 2018 | £271,000 |
Data validity fully verified
| April 2015 (2 total sales) | £200,000 |
Data validity fully verified
| March 2013 | £185,000 |
Data validity fully verified
| July 2012 (2 total sales) | £160,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| August 2009 | £130,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| July 2007 | £180,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| October 2006 (5 total sales) | £185,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| April 2005 | £50,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| October 2003 (2 total sales) | £135,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| August 2003 (2 total sales) | £140,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| August 2003 | £127,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| July 2003 | £122,700 |
Data validity partially verified
| May 2001 | £58,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| April 2001 | £72,500 |
Data validity partially verified
| November 2000 | £82,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| July 2000 | £82,500 |
Data validity partially verified
| July 2000 | £53,995 |
Data validity partially verified
| October 1999 (2 total sales) | £69,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| February 1999 | £55,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| July 1998 | £10,763 |
Data validity partially verified
| April 1998 | £48,500 |
Data validity partially verified
| May 1996 | £43,000 |
Data validity partially verified
| January 1996 | £36,000 |
The type distribution in Hazelbury Crescent is as follows:
Detached: 2
Terraced: 46
Semi-Detached: 11
Flats: 51
The most expensive sale recorded is 8 Hazelbury Crescent, Luton which sold for £300,000 on Oct 28, 2020. The property has a price per square metre of £1,546 psqm, which is -107% lower than the area average.
