Area info, specific search results, and unique insights.
The bottom dots represent local averages. Period is 5 years.
November 2021 (2 total sales) | £405,000 |
October 2021 (2 total sales) | £460,000 |
October 2020 (2 total sales) | £400,000 |
September 2020 (3 total sales) | £407,000 |
February 2019 (2 total sales) | £425,000 |
March 2015 (4 total sales) | £365,000 |
October 2014 (3 total sales) | £360,000 |
August 2014 (3 total sales) | £468,000 |
July 2014 (2 total sales) | £333,175 |
June 2013 | £347,500 |
March 2013 (2 total sales) | £271,000 |
October 2011 (2 total sales) | £249,999 |
May 2010 (2 total sales) | £170,000 |
July 2009 (2 total sales) | £225,000 |
August 2008 (3 total sales) | £224,000 |
July 2007 (2 total sales) | £318,000 |
October 2006 (2 total sales) | £281,000 |
July 2006 (3 total sales) | £283,000 |
March 2005 (2 total sales) | £265,000 |
September 2004 (2 total sales) | £125,000 |
May 2004 (3 total sales) | £247,500 |
April 2004 (4 total sales) | £270,000 |
November 2002 (3 total sales) | £218,500 |
October 2012 (4 total sales) | £275,000 |
February 2002 | £171,000 |
June 2003 (4 total sales) | £237,500 |
June 2001 (2 total sales) | £180,000 |
April 2001 (3 total sales) | £190,000 |
November 2000 (2 total sales) | £91,000 |
July 2000 (2 total sales) | £145,000 |
January 2000 (2 total sales) | £153,000 |
March 1999 | £130,000 |
July 2013 (4 total sales) | £363,000 |
September 2021 (5 total sales) | £390,000 |
December 1997 | £104,000 |
December 1997 (2 total sales) | £128,250 |
November 1997 | £80,000 |
May 1997 | £43,000 |
December 1996 | £111,000 |
December 2021 (4 total sales) | £385,000 |
March 1996 | £109,950 |
February 2023 (Recent) (4 total sales) | £440,000 |
May 2002 (3 total sales) | £223,000 |
The type distribution in OX26 6YF is as follows:
Detached: 42
Terraced: 8
Semi-Detached: 4
Flats: None
The most expensive sale recorded is 135 Ravencroft, Bicester which sold for £468,000 on Aug 1, 2014. The property is in tax band F. The property has a price per square metre of £3,120 psqm, which is -21% lower than the area average.